Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. Devapriya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 16:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A. Devapriya[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing notable about him. No coverage found. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - another initial-only cricketer which has slipped by over the last however many years. Strange, given that they're all within the same categories (not an attack, by the way, just an observation). Bobo . 20:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not even any where near even remotely notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I realize it's outside the Internet age but it's strange that information about players even from the early 1990s is significantly less available than that from a previous generation... Bobo . 21:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 06:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet the requirements of WP:NCRICKET --Whiteguru (talk) 09:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.