Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.Renee (artist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:41, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A.Renee (artist)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A young, non-notable artist. The article makes big but unsourced claims (thus not eligible for speedy deletion). This does not satisfy WP:BIO pr WP:CREATIVE. freshacconci talktalk 20:00, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —freshacconci talktalk 20:01, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Skates over a7, but doesn't meet the criteria for inclusion. @Kate (parlez) 20:01, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:V. The only citations are a primary source and an article apparently published when the subject was 13 years old and hadn't started painting yet. With only a first initial, it is impossible to verify anything in this article. Pburka (talk) 20:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Claims are so nebulous, and few or no Google hits, that a case can still be made for speedy deletion. 99.155.206.57 (talk) 20:38, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:CREATIVE. Joe Chill (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not ready for an encyclopedia, nn...Modernist (talk) 02:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.