Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A.D.C. Sanguedo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:24, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A.D.C. Sanguedo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2007, PROD removed in 2012, I can't find anything WP:GNG-related on this fifth-division club. They did participate in the (108-team, six group) third division in 1991, so coverage is possible, but I can't find much more than this (apart from database sites) to help source the article. SportingFlyer T·C 23:27, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 23:27, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. SportingFlyer T·C 23:27, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. BD2412 T 03:38, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:15, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 10:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete fails notability guidelines.Less Unless (talk) 14:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, playing in the Portuguese Third Division, and the Taça de Portugal. Passes NFOOTY.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - they are mentioned a few times here Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No validation of notability. Myconcern (talk) 19:33, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 10:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.