Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A-Haunting We Will Go (play) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:39, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A-Haunting We Will Go (play)[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. This play, while by a notable playwright, has never been performed by a professional theatre company. The "reviews" in the article are of performances by amateur student theatre groups; one a local review of a production at an American high school and the other an advertisement (not a review by a critic but a copy a now deprecated program which you can see here) by "Revised Edition Student Theatre Company"; the pre-professional theatre school attached to the professional Eastbourne based Revised Edition Theatre Company. I could find no secondary coverage of the play in reference works, and I personally don't think the one review in evidence, a local paper covering the local high school production, counts toward WP:SIGCOV. In other words, none of the sources provided in the first AFD which are currently in the article count as independent significant coverage. 4meter4 (talk) 03:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per nom. No sigcov of non-notable play. -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:39, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:42, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG, with no suitable sources online. Some of the decisions made in old AfD's seem so strange to me. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 23:20, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.