Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9 to 5 (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ÷seresin 02:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

9 to 5 (video game)[edit]

Delete nothing to indicate that this planned but cancelled video game is notable - barely any context to tell us what it would have been about. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:38, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No assertion of notability whatsoever. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 18:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Redirect to List of Atari 2600 games along with 32 in 1. Both are "substubs" with little apparent potential for expansion. Dancter (talk) 18:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No point in redirection if we can't even verify that it exists. Canceled games are almost never notable unless there's more we can say about them. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 19:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure what you mean by "exists." It was certainly announced and showcased by 20th Century Fox Video Games. Dancter (talk) 19:38, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Nine to Five. While not enough to sustain its own article, the information can be verified and even expanded a little using citations from Creative Computing,[1], AtariAge.[2], or The Miami Herald. Also a separate, similarly-named computer typing game (9 to 5 Typing) was actually released based on the movie. Dancter (talk) 20:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing to suggest notability. --TreyGeek (talk) 23:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.