Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9LU 137786
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no action. Article was dratified, making discussion moot. (non-admin closure) Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 16:37, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
9LU 137786[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 9LU 137786 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article appears to be a combination of citations to less-than-reliable sources and pure original research. The result is not an article worth including in Wikipedia. signed, Rosguill talk 02:51, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 02:51, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 02:51, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment it appears the user has moved this back to draftspace. It might be best to procedurally close this AfD on that basis. Ajf773 (talk) 03:06, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- Comment The page is now on draft namespace. Closing of AfD may be better as mentioned above by Ajf773.--PATH SLOPU 07:32, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.