Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/911 Nightmare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

911 Nightmare[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, does not have significant coverage by independent, reliable sources, there are a number of self-published/blog style reviews but nothing with editorial oversight, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 10:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:34, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I searched, but other than a rating from Radio Times (minus any actual review) this film seems to have been solidly ignored by media outlets. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 10:46, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would say delete. This definitely falls under my contention that U.S. TV movies that have aired on cable TV over the last 20 years are generally not notable, because most of them do not receive the level of significant coverage demanded by WP:GNG. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:43, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:58, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not enough citations, the film released 4 years ago so I'm not expecting any more sources to appear. Also, there's a nasty "press release"-style premise section. Scrooge200 (talk) 21:18, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.