Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/8BitBoy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 03:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

8BitBoy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously at PROD, twice (mine was removed because it was the 2nd). This article doesn't prove notability. (according to WP:VG/S) GamingUnion is unreliable, DigitallyDownloaded and Indie Haven aren't listed. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) There's a review in a Finnish magazine and an article at indiegames.com but all in all nothing meaningful in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 06:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 18:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I found nothing nothing enhancingly better convincing for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:01, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.