Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/817 BC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 810s BC. Daniel (talk) 01:02, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

817 BC[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only thing of note that supposedly happened in this year is factually wrong according to another sourced Wikipedia article. Also, most other years in the decade are just a redirect. 777burger ^talk ^contribs 22:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to 810s BC per nom (without merging its content, which is indeed incorrect as pointed out above). Lennart97 (talk) 22:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 810s BC there is not enough actual content to justify the superstructure of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to 810s BC. No content to merge and nothing to list. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per WP:SNOW. There's no context here, and only one tiny datum of content that is possibly incorrect, so it's useless for our core readership, students. Bearian (talk) 16:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge an another options per above. Jenyire2 (talk) 18:33, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.