Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6 pak
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete and then redirect to 6-pack as plausible search term. Also deleting Sega Genesis 6-PAK, as duplicate article for which all discussionhere is also applicable. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 02:28, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
6 pak[edit]
- 6 pak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
WP:NN product bundling. The individual games are very notable, but not the bundle itself. Toddst1 (talk) 15:59, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - It seems to have been covered by sufficient online sites (Google shows 7,500+ results) to merit an article. The bundle was also covered by JS Online here. The article needs revision, but I think the subject is just notable enough.Arbitrarily0 (talk) 17:17, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Merge and Redirect - It turns out that this article's topic also exists at Sega Genesis 6-PAK. The content from 6 pak should be merged there, where an AfD can be pursued if necessary. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 19:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. If it's that important it can be mentioned in the articles for the individual games. StonerDude420 (talk) 18:22, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 20:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to Six pack dab page as a likely spelling of that. 76.66.198.171 (talk) 10:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Six pack per IP above. I don't even see a reason to delete right now (with the exception of someone wanting to redirect-war over this). MuZemike (talk) 15:16, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to six pack - doesn't seem like a notable compilation, would be more useful as a redirect. Terraxos (talk) 00:45, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why not redirect to Sega Genesis 6-PAK instead? '6 pak' is a possible search term for the game. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.