Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/6D Global Technologies Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

6D Global Technologies Inc.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches basically found nothing better than their own PR at News and also 2 links at Highbeam, the current article contains nothing solidly convincing to keep and improve. I patrolled this for review almost two months and there's nothing else to suggest keeping for any longer. Notifying tagger Widefox. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Just PR puffing. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:08, 2 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete curious combination of PR and a lawsuit. My understanding is WP:NCORP discounts the latter for notability. Widefox; talk 13:16, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. This [1] is probably one of the very few non-trivial coverage in reliable and independent sources. There are some other sources related to the lawsuit [2], but these should be discounted per WP:ILLCON. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:04, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.