Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4rlz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. A3, lack of sufficient content and unlikely to expand. Mgm|^(talk) 10:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

4rlz[edit]

A dictionary entry of a neologism with hardly any content--not an article. Jchthys (talk) 20:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for the reasons given in my prod. ("Neologism with no claim in article of meeting WP:Notability. Unlikely to expand beyond a dictionary definition."). But since the prod tag is still in place, I'm wondering why this was brought to AfD?--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not an a dictionary for slang Ijanderson (talk) 22:14, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, speedily if possible No asssertion of notability. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:50, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. twirligig^{Leave one! ⋄ Check me out!} 04:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above: definition of a slang term. Cliff smith ^talk 06:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.