Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/45 Special

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 23:54, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

45 Special[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CORP. lacks third party coverage [1]. nothing particularly special about this night club (and we don't create articles for every night club in the world). LibStar (talk) 01:00, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this nightclub. Joe Chill (talk) 01:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: If you have inherent notability for every licensed radio station, why not for every licensed liquor sales location? OK, I'm not really serious about this point but I am seriously pushing for a low bar to licensed radio amateur to have notability if you accept commercial stations on that basis. Broadcasts below about 30Mhz have potential international notice. Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 12:07, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I couldn't find significant coverage of the nightclub. Jujutacular ^T · C 20:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unnotable night club that has had no coverage at all, from what I see. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 21:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.