Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/41 Ursae Majoris

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of stars in Ursa Major. Consensus is the star is not independently notable/deserving of a standalone article. Star Mississippi 14:51, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

41 Ursae Majoris[edit]

41 Ursae Majoris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Back on March 20, 2019 I tagged this article with a {{notability}} template after a failed search for indications of notability. This was removed on April 24 with the message "notability established by HR catalog number". I performed another search today, but it remains non-notable. All of the sources provided are in the nature of large-scale studies; there doesn't appear to be significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. The WP:NASTCRIT guideline suggests it is "presumed" notable, but it clearly fails to satisfy WP:GNG and thus should be deleted and possibly replaced by a redirect. Praemonitus (talk) 15:39, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.