Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3CS invention

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is the first time it's been created, salting seems like overkill. Jenks24 (talk) 10:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3CS invention[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Reads like an advertisement. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:56, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete and WP:SALT conflict of interest spammer. see also 3CS Invention. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mr RD 20:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:COI and WP:ADVERT.--3 of ♦ _{I go}^first 21:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A clear case for delete, but salting the title may not be necessary if someone explains to the article creator why the last page was deleted (and this one almost certainly will be as well), namely that it fails to meet the notability standard / golden rule. I see no reason to assume this isn't just a case of a new editor not understanding the relevant policies. And I'll take it upon myself to do the explaining. —GrammarFascist _contribs ^talk 23:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.