Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/35 Biggest Hits (Toby Keith album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 19:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

35 Biggest Hits (Toby Keith album)[edit]

No sources, 0 g-hits related to the name, pure WP:CRYSTAL. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 01:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as purely hoax album; nominator has history of problematic edits. No mention of this album on Toby's page or Show Dog Nashville. Furthermore, I doubt such an album would even exist, since a.) he hasn't been on Mercury since 1999, and b.) about half the songs here are from his DreamWorks albums anyway. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:CRYSTAL. The creator provided two sources in the talk page, but neither warrant substantial coverage yet. It's still way too soon. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: If I can't buy it, and if no one has it, then we cannot discuss it. This is because it does not exist. When it exists, and when it achieves some note in culture, it will be appropriate, but, at present, it is speculation about something that is presumed to have in the future some effect. Utgard Loki (talk) 13:56, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. At the moment it's purely a speculative article. Cloudz679 (talk) 14:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete my crystal ball says come back when it's an actual album Travellingcari (talk) 04:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - An album with a documented future release date is not WP:CRYSTAL. WP:CRYSTAL refers to pure, unsourced speculation, not to confirmed future release dates. That is why we have the {{future-album}} tag. The acceptable use of the tag has been confirmed before. —Torc. ^(Talk.) 21:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Massively pare down or delete While I found plenty of info that this is and album that will be released, I found nothing more than that. Particularly, I didn't find anything that indicated which songs are going to be on it other than "one [new] single, and then they're going to put on every hit song that we had from '93, 'Should've Been A Cowboy' on up to 'As Good As I Once Was,'".[1] The releasing label doesn't even have any info... — Scientizzle 16:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I agree on removing the tracklist since it appears to be a total guess by a fan on a message board, but that's just a content issue. The album itself isn't in question - the album itself does exist, so the problems aren't anything that requires deletion. Merger maybe, but the deletion of valid information shouldn't really be an option. (Bleh, I feel dirty doing this much research about this album.) —Torc. ^(Talk.) 01:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with the above. I have never heard of it, when, and if, it's released recreate the article with the correct information. Izzy007 Talk 23:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.