Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/34 Elton road
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:37, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
34 Elton road[edit]
Completely non-notable. Doesn't seem to match any WP:CSD criteria though (the closest being A7), hence this AFD. TheParanoidOne 17:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Definite delete. I think it might fall under the 'disclosing personal information' category - does anyone else? David | Talk 17:30, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per {{db-bio}}, otherwise Delete per nomination. Jaxal1 17:30, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. Regrettably I don't think it's a speedy. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 17:32, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - Erebus555 17:34, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --KimvdLinde 17:53, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Looks like student WP spam; delete as per nom. (aeropagitica) 18:19, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:00, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as per nomination. -- Arthur Frayn 19:03, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - CSD A7. --CrypticBacon 23:11, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NFT. Just zis Guy you know? 23:42, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - either a complaint about the standard of the house (redirect to Bristol City Council) or an advertisement for new tenants (redirect to Bristol Students Union noticeboard and the window of the local shop). Green Giant 02:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BAI. Stifle 11:27, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Vanity page....sort of. Nigelthefish 13:37, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It is semi-vanity in addition to being worthless information. Cool3 20:47, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.