Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/343743 Kjurkchieva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of minor planets: 343001–344000. j⚛e decker ^talk 21:13, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

343743 Kjurkchieva[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely fails to meet WP:NASTRO; no defining characteristics whatsoever. StringTheory11 (t • c) 00:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment WP:Notability (astronomical objects) states, "If an asteroid stub is found with a notability tag on it, and a good-faith search has been done to locate supporting references, then it is appropriate to redirect the stub to the appropriate List of... article." Unscintillating (talk) 16:57, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Problem is, the list doesn't exist in this case, or I would've already redirected it. StringTheory11 (t • c) 18:57, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of minor planets: 343001–344000 per usual practice. PWilkinson (talk) 19:06, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, how'd I miss that list...I was clearly too tired when I made this. StringTheory11 (t • c) 19:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested. I think everyone would have been comfortable with this being boldly redirected had the nom been aware of the list linked above. Stalwart111 11:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.