Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/33 Jazz Records (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 15:27, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

33 Jazz Records[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks independent coverage in multiple RS to meet WP:NCORP. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:47, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:30, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

deleteYep seems to lack any real notability. Looking at the last AFD I fail to see how WP:MUSIC applies as this does not seem to cover record publishers, but rather artists and their work.Slatersteven (talk) 14:53, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:29, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing the notability of the company. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 10:42, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: In the 2016 AfD I observed that "I haven't located substantial coverage of the label itself, in the absence of which this fails WP:CORPDEPTH" and searches now are showing an unchanged situation. The prevailing view in that AfD seemed to become that the company's release of the first album by Anita Wardell, who went on to win an award 7 years later, was a significant consideration; however, I view that as falling under WP:NOTINHERITED. AllyD (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No RS to support the notability of the article. Fails WP:NCORP. - Funky Snack (Talk) 20:28, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone do a Google search? Here is an article about Paul Jolly, the owner of 33 Jazz.
Vmavanti (talk) 15:39, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that's the existing source. Nevertheless, it is a source.
Vmavanti (talk) 15:49, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How about this? "roster suggests a cultural prominence consistent with WP:MUSIC's definition of an important indie label".
Vmavanti (talk) 16:00, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The artists they represent or release do not contribute to the notability of the label itself, per WP:NOTINHERITED.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:06, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Remarkable, really, because I quoted an editor who used that reason whenever I tried to get a label deleted, and he nearly always succeeded in keeping the article. The question then becomes: What's different here compared to those instances?
Vmavanti (talk) 17:07, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I guess in those discussions there were not enough editors around who know the policies as you or I do. See the recent (long) discussion on galleries on the WP:N talk page.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 22:47, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.