Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/31999998

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Deletion carried out by mikka. android 79 05:37, August 6, 2005 (UTC)

31999998[edit]

That's right. A number. A nn number at that. No redeemable article here. -DNicholls 22:38, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Crush by huge number Really! DES 22:40, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable. —PrologFan {Talk} 22:48, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Shanes 23:16, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A uniquely encyclopedic subject — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.252.0.6 (talk • contribs) 2005-07-26 23:28:02 UTC who was the author of the article being considered for deletion
Delete. 319999998 sux0rs, 319999999 r0x0rs! But they're both non-notable. Nandesuka 01:14, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Ken 02:27, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
This article was a member of the deleted

List_of_number_greater_than_or_equal_to_the_number_of_search_results_they_produce_on_Google. Let's not allow it to spread to enough WP-mirrors to violate that criterion. Delete 319999999 times. Barno 01:31, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Paul August ☎ 03:34, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. --Trovatore 03:58, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Oleg Alexandrov 04:12, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pointless Cyclone49 04:25, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, useless article. — JIP | Talk 05:15, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and post this talk page to BJAODN. ;-) Xaa 20:43, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. mikka (t) 21:07, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.