Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/301655722 Angels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete housekeeping non-admin closure: 07:13, 29 April 2013 Vejvančický (talk | contribs) deleted page 301655722 Angels (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.nytimes.com/1993/12/11/us/beliefs-023493.html, The Encyclopedia of Angels, p. 37) czar · · 07:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Post-closing statement: The numbers were mentioned in several reliable books and newspaper articles; it could be mentioned in our article Angels in Judaism. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 07:20, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

301655722 Angels[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page is mostly-sorta a copyvio of this (only one sentence long, though); I don't feel comfortable tagging it as vandalism, but we really don't need it... Ignatz mice•talk 04:38, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:20, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. czar · · 05:20, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete G12: unambiguous copyvio. (I'm comfortable tagging it as it is.) It's a direct copyvio, and the topic doesn't pass GNG via ghits, and if it were to be a subpage of Kabbalah or Angels or whatever, it would be phrased differently than a number of angels. The specific "301655722 Angels" isn't independently notable. Waste of our time: speedy it. czar · · 05:26, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. In the event that the speedy is rejected, I support deletion per nom. Andrew³²⁷ 06:19, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.