Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3,4-Dichlorobicyclo(3.2.1)oct-2-ene (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

3,4-Dichlorobicyclo(3.2.1)oct-2-ene[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. OrganoMetallurgy (talk) 21:29, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Chemical compounds must meet the general notability guideline to be included in Wikipedia. This one clearly does not. Merely being an intermediate in the preparation of another compound (which is itself insufficiently notable to have an article) is well below the bar of "significant coverage in reliable sources". -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:13, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:33, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - insufficient potential sources online. "I can't imagine how this could be considered notable, since it has no use except to make other chemicals," said the science teacher. Bearian (talk) 20:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.