Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2channel (2ch.sc)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2channel. Content can be merged from history. Sandstein 08:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2channel (2ch.sc)[edit]

2channel (2ch.sc) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Devoid of useful content. "It says Not to be confused with 2channel", but its clearly something to do with that. Maybe someone who can read Japanese can rescue the article, but in its present state it is not worth keeping. Rathfelder (talk) 17:19, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:25, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:25, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There are two news articles embedded to the article, so GNG should be met. Deletion is not cleanup, after all. ミラP 22:15, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete An offshoot that only deserves a small mention in the 2channel article; only creates further confusion with 2chan in the hatnotes. Goszei 23:36, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete/Merge to 2channel per Goszei.4meter4 (talk) 13:00, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.