Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2River (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Neıl ☎ 10:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2River[edit]

procedural nomination—version at time of AFD: This survived as 'keep' when previously at AFD in April 2006, albeit there was only one opinion provided. PROD nominator (82.11.63.20 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)) stated "Non notable, no reliable sources". User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:18, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Poetry has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 04:28, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 12:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If it has been around that long, then 3rd party verification should have been there. I didn't find any on the article. A quick googling shows Cafepress, Wikipedia and a bunch of blogs. They don't claim notability, they claim clients with notability and can't provide citations. Non-notable and spam to boot. Pharmboy (talk) 20:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.