Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/22 Cortlandt Street

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

22 Cortlandt Street[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed by author without explanation. The source cited in article is not reliable. GNews coverage lists one passing mention that fails GNG overall. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 21:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 22:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 22:53, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rapid Delete As per nominator, source is unreliable. Search tools turn up no promising dedicated sources. PROD should have gone through. Out with it quickly, please. Tapered (talk) 01:40, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Quicky chuck; GNG and nom reasoning. L3X1 (distant write) 01:46, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Does not pass WP:GNG. I noticed the creator has a few other building articles that could also qualify for AfD. Ajf773 (talk) 03:34, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is nothing here that establishes notability and a Google search turned up nothing meaningful to add. There are probably a thousand such buildings in New York City that are of equivalent size and equally limited notability. Alansohn (talk) 17:55, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this is one of thousands of such buildings in Manhattan. Bearian (talk) 18:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have found a couple of passing mentions in the NYT, but nothing more. It's a non-notable Emery Roth & Sons building, from what I can see. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Century 21 (department store), where there is some 9/11 info. Station1 (talk) 22:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.