Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/209: A Story
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
209: A Story[edit]
- 209: A Story (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unremarkable book. The article tells you nothing other than who it was written by and its date of publication Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:33, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable book by non-notable author. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 08:27, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable, self-published book; fails WP:NBOOK. Another example of why we need a speedy criteria for self-published books... Yunshui 雲水 09:10, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I have found some sources, but they cover one set period in time. I'm thinking that this might be best served as a merge and redirect into the author's article or vice-versa. The sources I found kind of cover the author and the book, but I don't think it would cover notability for both of them. I'm not entirely certain as of yet that it even covers enough to show notability for one of them (so I'm withholding my vote until I find more sources), but it's a start.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:41, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: I see where the book was mentioned in relation to a museum exhibit in the Museum of Victoria, but it's such a brief mention that I'm not entirely sure what to do with it, if anything: [1] Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:45, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —SW— soliloquize 21:09, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:NBOOK. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.