Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2059 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 04:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2059[edit]

Only one, astronomical, scheduled event. Does not qualify as notable. Hello, My Name Is SithMAN8 (talk) 23:48, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. (Alternatively, merge 2050–2059 into 2050s.) Part of a family of articles. I'd say we should keep these unless all of the decade were merged. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:55, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Arthur Rubin; and an astronomical event is notable. --Orrelly Man (talk) 19:58, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a classic example of Wikipedia:There is no deadline. I have no doubt that the article will expand. Keep, unless we change our tradition of having articles about years. --J.Mundo (talk) 05:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No third-party sources or references or other indications of notability provided. Things are not noteable simply because they exist. Jtrainor (talk) 10:14, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not being verified means it can be fixed through editing. It's not the same as unverifiability. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Yes, the article is a bit empty but it will fill up as we get closer to the time. We will, eventually, have a 2059 article, (as I have no doubt Wikipedia will be around that long), so we might as well start it now. As for the one event currently listed, in 50 years times, who knows, it might be a first. FFMG (talk) 05:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:30, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per Jmundo, FFMG. Edward321 (talk) 06:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As 2059 approaches this article will be filled with information. For instance, many state caucuses and primaries for the 2060 US Presidential election will probably be held that year. It's also important as a reference for other calendar systems. --Mr Accountable (talk) 05:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.