Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2030 FIFA World Cup (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2030 FIFA World Cup[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sounds a lot like WP:CRYSTAL. Baseball Watcher 01:40, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This event is too far in the future to justify having an article now. We don't even have an article about the 2026 FIFA World Cup yet. Furthermore, the only source used in this article is what "some say". There is no indication of who these "some" are. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:43, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I recommend that after the deletion, a redirect to FIFA World Cup should be created, but only if the redirect is fully protected. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:02, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete until such time as reliable sources begin discussing these games (still 19 years in the future) in sufficient depth to create an informative, well-referenced article. Cullen328 (talk) 02:45, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete until there are some RS. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:54, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No more than speculation. Kevin McE (talk) 07:36, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL--♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 15:27, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:20, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL - don't you people know that the world will end in 2012?! Giant Snowman 17:21, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -WP:CRYSTAL. This event is too far in the future to be notable right now. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:56, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete under WP:CSD G7. Speculation and crystal ballery. --Jimbo^[online] 07:41, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per GiantSnowman! (the WP:CRYSTAL violation bit, that is ☺ ). —BETTIA— ^talk 08:47, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete We've been through this twice before. Full chrystal balling; even if sources were available... L.tak (talk) 21:32, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and maybe even Snow - but no speedy deletion criteria applies to this article right now. Thparkth (talk) 01:51, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.