Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 EAFF E-1 Football Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:30, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2024 EAFF E-1 Football Championship[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two sources listed in this article is about the 2022 EAFF E-1 Football Championship and no reliable source of 2024 EAFF E-1 Football Championship can be found. Qby (talk) 10:13, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Football, and South Korea. Shellwood (talk) 10:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: China, Hong Kong, Japan, Mongolia, and Taiwan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:42, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 16:53, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Since all previous editions of the EAFF E-1 Football Championship have their own article, I believe that 2024 edition should be kept and developed. I already added one source to the article, meanwhile I think a WP:PROD is a better solution.Ma.Sa.54 (talk) 22:35, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PROD is not a better solution, as you can't PROD an article if it's the subject of an AFD. Also, most of the time, a PROD gets removed without fixing anything, and then you start and AFD anyway.

Move to draftspace as WP:TOOSOON, and it doesn't currently demonstrate that it passes WP:GNG. The fact other articles in the series exist is not a good enough reason to keep this a year before the event, as per WP:OSE. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify. We have a policy on this kind of article at WP:CRYSTAL: Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. I'm not seeing evidence of notability in the article, nor evidence that it is "almost certain to take place". CRYSTAL also stipulates that topics are generally inappropriate if nothing can be said about them that is verifiable and not original research. The GSA source doesn't appear particularly reliable, and the piece of information extracted ("The finals were originally scheduled to be held in South Korea.") is probably original research under WP:SYNTH, so the CRYSTAL provision applies; this is an inappropriate topic for now. On the other hand, there's a decent chance this will become an appropriate topic, and the existing work is usable for an article in the future, so draftification seems appropriate. Actualcpscm^{scrutinize, talk} 11:13, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.