Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Winter Olympics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 16:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Winter Olympics[edit]

Was tagged speedy but not under a speedy criterion. Nevertheless, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. ➨ ❝R E DVERS❞ 22:30, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep --Mboverload 22:48, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: unsourced, unencyclopedic crystal balling. Royboy crashfan 22:53, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. While likely to happen, there's probably nothing to say about these games right now that wouldn't be original research. BryanG 04:02, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Please see this page for information on the current debate on this matter. → J @red 17:04, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per WP:NOT a crystal ball . While there is an exception to the crystal ball principle for "scheduled or expected future events", this is so far into the future that "nothing can be said about [it] that is verifiable and not original research". Wait until the bids are announced. --bainer (talk) 02:52, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like it was created out of boredom. Gold Stur 04:47, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is 2024 Summer Olympics, so why not 2022 ? Hektor 20:12, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The question,really, is how many is too many. I invite you all to join the discussion I stated above and give your input. It just seemed to me when I went to delete some of these that some had more valuable info than others, and it would be a pity to lose some info that may be useful in the future. → J @red 20:26, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Utmost Keep If we kept 2024, we have to keep something earlier. Jonathan235 17:28, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Hektor brings up a very valid point. I see no reason why this article should be deleted when the summer olympics has an article take occurs two years after this one.--Cini 19:35, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.