Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Mini Challenge UK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Less Unless (talk) 07:23, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Mini Challenge UK[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another contested redirect - wholly unsourced, so reverting the redirect was a violation of WP:BURDEN. Appears to be zero in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:49, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:59, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom, 0 sources or significant coverage. --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 10:38, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to editing. Article is not finished, please advise on how to move article to drift form. WezMan444 (talk) 12:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You would need to provide sources proving that the information in the article has been subject to significant coverage. TheInsatiableOne (talk) 09:56, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now or draftify - Article was only recreated a day or so before this AfD was started, and while it may have been better off in draft space not much time was given for it to be developed before being threatened with deletion. Doing a WP:BEFORE search on this subject is difficult due to deluge of false positives returned, but some leads do show up, such as in Autosport or the Irish Independent, so it is more than possible that sufficient sourcing exists. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 12:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify per HumanBodyPiloter5's rationale. While I don't think WezMan444 acted correctly by reverting the redirect (perhaps because they're "new to editing"), neither did the nominator by opening this AfD just hours after the recreation. This article is obviously work in progress - and there's a possibility that it meets WP:GNG. Incubate in draftspace, give WezMan444 et al time to develop it, and then we will see. MSport1005 (talk) 13:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify To give the editor more time to hopefully improve the article and establish notability. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.