Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 L'Open 35 de Saint-Malo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 15:32, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 L'Open 35 de Saint-Malo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during new page patrol. No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. No GNG type sources and use of the SNG wp:seasons way in requires primarily prose as an indicator of such which this misses by far. The only reference is their own website. Tagged by others for such issues since May with no references added North8000 (talk) 02:00, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Tennis, and France. ––FormalDude talk 07:47, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No national coverage in French sources, only local coverage in Ouest-France or on tennis websites. Would appear to be a low-level tournament. Oaktree b (talk) 21:23, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources don't have to be national in scope or "general interest" for them to count towards GNG. In my searches I have found [1] [2] and [3], which along with the sources Oaktree b mentions (but does not link to) should be enough to meet GNG. The nominator should also be well aware that GNG passing sources don't need to be in an article for an article to survive NPP (they only need to exist). Iffy★Chat -- 20:13, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 02:48, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I limited my searches to only .fr websites and get: [4]. First one in Ouest-France is [5], "Five good reasons to go to the open 35 de tennis this weekend", appears to be a brief mention of 5 good things at the tournament. [6] talks about the opening of the tournament. I didn't think they qualified as substantial articles, mostly brief mentions. Other mentions of the Kinesiologists at the tournament and how local students are going to it. Nothing terribly notable about these articles, reliable, yes, substantial, no. Oaktree b (talk) 03:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for sharing your sources. I've now also found [7] (more significant regional coverage of the tournament) and [8], showing that the tournament received TV coverage in addition to the text sources we've been discussing. Iffy★Chat -- 11:26, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails GNG. Henriklars (talk) 08:16, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I think the sources linked by Iffy as well as the other sources that are referenced above which exist but aren't in the article are enough to get this one over the WP:GNG line. Adamtt9 (talk) 11:48, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.