Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018–2019 Hashtag United season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 19:39, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018–2019 Hashtag United season[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSEASONS. Jamez42 (talk) 00:48, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 01:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 01:01, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. And up the Hashtags! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 06:10, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Hashtag United as per WP:NSEASONS which states "Team season articles should consist mainly of well-sourced prose, not just statistics and lists of players. Wikipedia is not a stats directory. It is strongly recommended that those articles be redirected to the team page if no sourced prose can be created.". Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 10:50, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 12:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 12:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a club that plays six levels below the lowest professional league definitely does not merit an individual season article. Granted the club has attracted some media coverage disproportionate for the level at which they play, but there is no evidence that the coming season will attract the truly extraordinary level of coverage which would be needed for a GNG pass. BTW, if by any chance the article gets kept then it needs to be moved because the correct format for a season is 20XX-YY, not 20XX-20YY............ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:09, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of any notability. Giant Snowman 12:38, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect not notable enough to have an individual season article. Redirect to the team page, per Bungle. Tillerh11 (talk) 13:48, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Don't really understand the reason for redirecting it as a) it's not notable b) it's a very unlikely search-term and c) it's not even in the correct format for season articles. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:55, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You are probably not aware of the team, it is a likely search term zvikorn ^zvikorn 22:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, and why the hell would you want to redirect to the club page? That makes no sense, who on earth is going to search for a season that hasn't even been played yet in a league way down the league ladder??? Govvy (talk) 18:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This team is very popular on youtube, even thought it is in a very low league they have plenty of fans and they page will only grow once the season starts. zvikorn (talk) 22:02, 22 June 2018 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: zvikorn (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this AfD. [reply]
Delete - Why would you have a seasonal article for a team that isn't in the Football League. Yeah just because its a team that is on YouTube doesn't mean anything and yes I am a fan of the team. Animation is developing 10:54, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment because fans want to know whats going on — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zvikorn (talk • contribs) 19:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Then they can find out from the club's website. It's not like if this information isn't on Wikipedia then it won't be available at all -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:34, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NSEASONS. Yes, this is a weirdly notable team and so this season might end up being notable if it gets sufficient coverage, but that can be reviewed once at least a reasonable proportion of the season has passed, certainly not before it has even begun. Fenix down (talk) 14:23, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TOOSOON applies in that case. --Jamez42 (talk) 16:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.