Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016–17 Woking F.C. season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 03:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016–17 Woking F.C. season[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSEASONS, recent AfD on club season article in the same division resulted in unanimous decision for deletion. This was prodded and the prod had expired, but it was then removed with no rationale given. Also nominating 2016–17 Gateshead F.C. season for exactly the same reason and in the same circumstances. Number 5 7 18:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And seeing as this has had only one comment so far, I'm adding 2015–16 Woking F.C. season to the nomination for the same reason – also deprodded without a rationale. @Lugnuts: Would you like to comment on the additional nomination? Cheers, Number 5 7 12:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, delete for the same rationale. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 12:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 06:55, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clear WP:NSEASONS failure, in no way playing in a top professional league. Fenix down (talk) 08:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 17:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both: per nom. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 07:40, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both Fail WP:NSEASONS- we deleted quite a few Conference seasons articles a few days ago for this reason. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:10, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clearly too soon. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.