Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 ICC World Twenty20 statistics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 ICC World Twenty20 statistics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Un-needed content-fork with little or no context. Note that other stat pages for previous tournaments don't exist. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 11:46, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Lugnuts, 2007-2012 ICC World twenty 20 statistics and records pages do exists with elaborated statistics, so only thing is 2014 stats page is empty, based on your message i've updated that page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vin09 (talk • contribs) 12:45, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, at the risk of falling foul of WP:OTHERSTUFF, all the other tournaments do have stats pages, and while this one is under developed because the tournament is still under way, it is a notable and justified list in my opinion. Harrias ^talk 06:48, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Harrias. I didn't spot the other articles. I must have been in a Stuart Broad-esque rage about the thunder at the time. And the article was in this shape when I nominated it. Happy to withdraw this now. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.