Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 in Australian literature

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to 2013 in literature. Stifle (talk) 17:31, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2013 in Australian literature[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only 2 entries throughout the year; better to get the entries merge in 2013 in literature Awards section. Ninney (talk) 16:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment What about merge into (or create) 2010s in Australian literature instead? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:59, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me Refer List of years in Australian literature Which lists a link from 2003 to 2009 as good listing pages. Your suggestion of merging enteries from 2010 to 2019 as 2010s in Australian literature sounds feasible. I am OK with whatever is appropriate, Hoping for more opinions on the subject matter. Thanks User:Lugnuts - Ninney (talk) 18:24, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 19:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please stop discussing here separately, instead lets discuss jointly in similiar article - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 in Australian literature~~ - Ninney (talk) 15:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: As per discussion result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 in Australian literature, the result was merge to 2011 in literature. Likewise, can we have similiar consensus on 2012 in Australian literature & 2013 in Australian literature? - Ninney (talk) 23:27, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to new article 2010s in Australian literature. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 in Australian literature concluded rather vaguely with the suggestion of merging, but it left the merge target open. I think having a specific article for Australian literature is better than losing it in a worldwide article, but I appreciate that others may feel differently. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:29, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to 2013 in literature, as per Ninney, modelled on 2011 in literature. No apparent good reason that recent literature review articles should be divided by nation. Yes, the YYYY in literature series needs work. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:09, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.