Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 UEFA European Under-19 Football Championship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:10, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2013 UEFA European Under-19 Football Championship[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Too early. This tournament will not happen for 3 years. There is not even an article for the 2012 tournament yet. Fails WP:GNG. SnottyWong ^converse 17:20, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 2028 Summer Olympics going to be after 18 years but nobady do not deleting it for that. Xraig (talk) 20:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)— Xraig (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

WP:OTHERSTUFF is generally not a convincing argument to keep an article. Also, comparing the Olympics to a teenager football tournament doesn't seem like a fair or relevant comparison. Cities will often start preparing for a bid to host the olympics more than a decade before the event would actually happen, which is why the comments on the AfD for the 2028 Olympics (which closed as no consensus, by the way) focused on the fact that there were reliable sources which were already discussing which cities were preparing to bid for it. SnottyWong ^comment 21:54, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There is not really anything to say about this tournament yet, especially since only one of the competing nations has been decided. In addition, I can't imagine this is notable yet. Are people interested in it yet? The google search yields a single result from a rather underwhelming website which has a link to this page which has just copied the WP article lead. —Half Price 09:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- For info, that entire site is merely a Wikiscrape -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:24, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Giant Snowman 09:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. As well, the article can be recreated when there is a wealth more of information. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 16:13, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.