Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 NFL quarterbacks win–loss records

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 00:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2012 NFL quarterbacks win–loss records[edit]

2012 NFL quarterbacks win–loss records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list lacks notability per our guidelines (WP:LISTN), as it is not discussed "as a group or set by independent reliable sources." Year-by-year win/loss records for NFL quarterbacks are not a common topic, and this falls clearly into WP:NOTSTATS. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 01:07, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 01:12, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I think this one is a little too granular detail for our encyclopedia. Try another wiki??--Paul McDonald (talk) 12:35, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per NOTSTATS. A single year's win-loss record is of interest only to the most rabid of fans. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:50, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete While I appreciate the detail taken to create the page, I don't think it belongs on Wikipedia. There are sport websites out there dedicated to sharing these stats and information. Gameinfirmary (talk) 23:07, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Non-notable stat for a specific season. WikiVirusC(talk) 15:02, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete while it seems a shame to delete such a well-constructed article, this is too narrow a statistical scope for our encyclopedia. Lepricavark (talk) 16:27, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It does have a lot of good info, however it is an accessibility nightmare. It also has gif icons! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:02, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.