Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 CFL season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2012 CFL season[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The 2010 season has barely begun, isn't this jumping the gun a bit? 2 says you, says two 23:11, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Several articles link to this season, so I think that it's important that it links somewhere. It has the same information as the 2011 season, so it's not for a lack of info. Cmm3 (talk) 23:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The articles that link have to do with the expectation that the Winnipeg Blue Bombers new stadium will be ready in 2012, and that (not updated in nearly a year) speculation that a new Ottawa team would play in 2012. The others links are placeholders [1], for the 100th Grey Cup and in a template on 2011 CFL season. If a franchise was awarded for '12 there might be something to say, but there's no reason to create an article if there's nothing to report. I'd note that we don't have anything yet to say about the 2012 NFL season either. Mandsford 15:07, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete too early.--Paul McDonald (talk) 18:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - too soon. -- Whpq (talk) 13:47, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.