Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 in Slovak football

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2010 in Slovak football[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article makes no attempt at prose and is just a stats depository, of which there is already one containing the information at Slovakia national football team results. Article is an unnecessary content fork of the aforementioned article, it is an orphan and contains no prose, so a merge is not appropriate. C 679 18:11, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C 679 18:12, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not needed, all relevant information is already present in an existing article. These kinds of articles can be notable - but this one is not. Giant Snowman 18:29, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:30, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unnecessary fork, WP:NOTSTATS violation as well. Fenix down (talk) 10:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:NSEASONS. This article makes no attempts at prose, and therefore fails the relevant notability guideline. Sir Sputnik (talk) 07:07, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.