Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Auburn Tigers football team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Auburn Tigers football#2010 schedule. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:25, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Auburn Tigers football team[edit]

WP:CRYSTAL. We've had this discussion before. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011 Kansas State Wildcats football team. The planned schedule info was useful, so I merged it into Auburn Tigers football#2010 schedule. With that out of the way, I think article can go bye-bye. De FaultRyan 15:18, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Auburn Tigers football#2010 schedule. Now that you have merged the content, I think it should be kept as a redirect per WP:Merge and Delete. Regardless, I see no reason to delete this rather than making it a redirect. Calathan (talk) 20:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Is the schedule even official? I imagine the non-conference games and dates can be verified, but has the SEC schedule really been released this early? Or is it just taking past schedules to predict future ones? If the conference schedule cannot be verified, I'd like to see the article deleted and the schedule removed from the Auburn Tigers football article. — X96lee15 (talk) 21:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - The schedule is pulled from the team's official site, so I have to assume it's legitimate, albeit still subject to change when it's this far out. DeFaultRyan 22:36, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Actually I'm pretty sure college teams set their schedules like three, four years in advance, the reason I know this is because like two years ago Syracuse scheduled USC for like 2011 and 2012.--Giants27 (t|c|r|s) 00:56, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - Not for conference schedules though. Non-conference for sure. — X96lee15 (talk) 14:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:40, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect A little too far our there recreate in two years for the 2011 season.--Giants27 (t|c|r|s) 00:56, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect because the information is already available at Auburn Tigers Football. ZabMilenko^{How am I driving?} 02:21, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - you can't merge content and then delete a article. A redirect must be put in place for proper GFDL licensing. (You must also follow the other instructions at WP:MERGE. --ThaddeusB (talk) 06:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.