Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Serbian Air Force MiG-29 crash
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 13:32, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
2009 Serbian Air Force MiG-29 crash[edit]
- 2009 Serbian Air Force MiG-29 crash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tragic but not notable military crash. Fails WP:AIRCRASH and WP:NOTNEWS, no WP:PERSISTENCE...William 19:38, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William 19:38, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ...William 19:38, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. ...William 19:38, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William 19:38, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to 204th Air Brigade, the unit that operated the aircraft and that the pilot was the commander of at the time of the crash. - The Bushranger One ping only 20:15, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not really notable for a stand alone but could be listed in related list articles as appropriate. MilborneOne (talk) 18:13, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Routine coverage of routine event. Fighter planes crash from time to time--seems run-of-the-mill to me. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 22:19, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nothing remarkable, nothing long-lasting as a result. It strikes me as undue weight as a standalone article. Kyteto (talk) 00:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.