Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Dnipropetrovsk fire (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Mandsford 19:25, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2009 Dnipropetrovsk fire[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTNEWS. This is a non-notable event and fires occur often. Last AfD was no consensus. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable event. --Diego Grez (talk) 23:43, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - seems like a clear case of WP:NOTNEWS, as there is no evidence of lasting effect.--70.80.234.196 (talk) 00:32, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. -- Jmundo (talk) 01:06, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Wikipedia is not the news. There is no evidence of lasting impact. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 12:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 14:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep - the article can be expanded, I think e fire causing ten deaths is notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Melaen (talk • contribs) 11:48, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- What policy says it is notable? —Mike moral ♪♫ 06:25, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.