Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009–10 Milton Keynes Dons F.C. season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. A Train^talk 17:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2009–10 Milton Keynes Dons F.C. season[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a simple league table and no real content Qed237 (talk) 21:03, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Qed237 (talk) 21:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator – It is clear now that it is notable and my main concern is no longer valid as the article has gotten some major imrovement and actually contains some content now. Qed237 (talk) 15:02, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - article needs improving, not deleting. This is a season in a fully-professional league and is notable per WP:NSEASONS. Giant Snowman 21:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We can not keep articles that is just a single league table and no other content. Then a lot of very poor articles will be created and kept. Qed237 (talk) 21:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a list of stats. Qed237 (talk) 21:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per WP:NSEASONS. Being in poor nick isn't a justification for deletion when the topic is notable. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:09, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per WP:NSEASONS. AFD is not cleanup. Smartyllama (talk) 00:47, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am the editor who began this article, in the same vein as the 2010–11 Milton Keynes Dons F.C. season article, the 2015–16 Manchester United F.C. season, and other such Wikipedia articles. If we were to delete this article, as according to this proposal, then in accordance, shouldn't the others be deleted as well? I also intend on adding more to the article, but have not the time to come around and add yet. Kerl126 (talk) 16:23, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Kerl126: The Manchester United article has content and should definately not be deleted, surprised you cant see the big difference. The other MK Dons articlce is really poor and just stats and may be discussed. Qed237 (talk) 17:29, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Consensus has clearly established that for English football seasons where clubs have competed in the top four tiers of English football are seasons where clubs have, for the purposes of WP:NSEASONS, competed in a "top professional league". The quality of the article is not relevant for AfD. Fenix down (talk) 10:06, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As above. The article seems much improved to when it was first brought to AfD, maybe that helped it. Govvy (talk) 10:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.