Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2006 Ipoh apostasy protest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Ipoh apostasy protest[edit]

No relevant sources, horribly partial, poorly written. Sumbuddi (talk) 15:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Feels like a non-notable event to me.Tyrenon (talk) 19:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It seems notable enough to me, but sourcing and POV are horrible. no real redeeming value in this form ThomasPolder (talk) 20:41, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Evidently notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 17:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. 13 gnews hits and it's obvious that many have nothing to do with the protest. Non-notable. Niteshift36 (talk) 13:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete "ipoh apostasy" (with the quotes) generates Zero hits from google news. The referencing used does not support much of the content of the article. Most of it is unsourced OR and should be removed. One of the sourced info is irrelevent to the subject of the article. The second mentions "the protest" in a trivial fashion. Duffbeerforme (talk) 16:59, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteThis article is difficult to accept into Wikipedia, due to poor writing, lack of a notable event, lack of a neutral point of view, and the possible use of this article to increase religious conflict in Ipoh, Perak, or elsewhere in Malaysia. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.