Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005-2006 Washington Redskins Season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge to History of the Washington Redskins. bainer (talk) 10:34, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

2005-2006 Washington Redskins Season

Just a random season of a team, merge what ever useful to Washington Redskins and Delete --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:17, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

• Comment An improper attempt was made to close this debate. I have reversed it. Hawkestone 02:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment normally if a nominator withdraws, a AFD is closed, I withdrew my delete vote so it should be closed, The info is already in the History of the Washington Redskins article, no need to keep, we can't have articles on every season of every team --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 02:45, 13 March 2006 (UTC)--Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 02:45, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per new proposition. Keep. The information meets Wikipedia:Notability. —Eternal Equinox | talk 03:36, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. We have similar articles about other sports clubs seasons. Changed my vote to merge, as per Jaranda. Carioca 03:38, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I only see articles on other sport leagues seasons not sports clubs, I created the History of the Washington Redskins article, I request a vote to merge to there. --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Two examples of sports clubs seasons: West Ham United F.C. 1985-1986 and Manchester United 1998-1999. Carioca 03:56, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Jaranda. --Terence Ong 04:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per everybody. Crzrussian 07:36, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to 2005 NFL season or to the redskins article -- Astrokey44|talk 15:39, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• merge per above. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 15:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This level of detail can be expected for more and more teams. In the long run merging won't be viable. An article like this can be linked for both an NFL article and a franchise article, killing 2 birds with one stone. Bhoeble 16:18, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

• Disagree. The information belongs on Wikipedia, but there's too much to be on the main page. The goal is to have a brief summary on the main Redskins page and then a link to the in-depth article, similar to the manner in which History of the United States is handled on the United States page. -J Train 03:29, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
  • But a article on every season is not the way to go though, at the most it some of the info should be in a History of the Washington Redskins article, we can't have articles on every season of every team better of to merge there --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:37, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep It isn't "random" as it is last season and for a major team. I expect many such articles will be created as Wikipedia expands. f it is merged it will need to be demerged. The flexibility given by breakout articles is one of Wikipedia's greatest strengths. Hawkestone 02:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• We already have 1995 in baseball, History of the New England Patriots, etc but we don't have 1972 Miami Dolphins,

I don't think that articles like that will be created in a while --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 02:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• Merge, duh... — Mar. 13, '06 [02:47] <freakofnur_xture|talk>
• Merge per everyone --Khoikhoi 03:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This type of article is inevitable, and there is enough material to have it merit on its own. --Larsinio 20:11, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.