Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004 World Cup of Hockey match stats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:09, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2004 World Cup of Hockey match stats[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTSTATS. Indiscriminate and mostly trivial information. Completely lacking in context for anyone not already familiar with the tournament, and an unnecessary fork of 2004 World Cup of Hockey. PROD removed without comment. Reso lute 05:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 05:48, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as an unnecessary fork. Relevent stats could be better included in the 2004 World Cup of Hockey article using Template:IceHockeybox instead of the current format for each game. Salavat (talk) 06:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, also ive started a reformat of the 2004 World Cup of Hockey article here if anyone is interested. Salavat (talk) 10:41, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Follow-up comment, so i implemented a full format change (so if you were interested your to late :)). The final standings i think i got right but not 100% sure so if someone could take a look. Also when i did the player stats tables it looked like they may not have been fully updated. Salavat (talk) 14:24, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Awesome! I was going to do the same when I had a chance, but glad to see you got there first! At some point I'd like to see all of the CCs/WCs look like 1976 Canada Cup. Reso lute 14:31, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unnecessary content fork and full of trivial information. Anything important can be included on the 2004 World Cup of Hockey page. -DJSasso (talk) 12:33, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTSTATS, and therefore nominator. oknazevad (talk) 15:21, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Content Fork, the only things present not in the main article are the PP chances and the 3 stars which are, of course, unreferenced--Mo Rock...Monstrous (talk) 15:36, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 2004 World Cup of Hockey handles this in a more efficient way, which is to link the game info for persons who like a lot of statistics with their breakfast. Mandsford 18:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above comments, 2004 World Cup of Hockey already has the info in this article. Bhockey10 (talk) 19:50, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is about quality not quantity. Having two articles about the same subject (also known as forking) will just cause confusion. If any relevant content exists it can be merged into 2004 World Cup of Hockey . Perhaps someone could help the creator understand the policy of searching for an title before creating a article (in other words making sure no similar articles exist). Sincerely Venustas 12 (talk) 21:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Searching the history of both articles shows that they were both created in 2004 by the same group of people while the tournament was going on, and after six years, I'm sure that the article creator doesn't require a lecture from any of us. Mandsford 01:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.