Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2004–05 UEFA Cup first round
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No prejudice towards a merge discussion. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
2004–05 UEFA Cup first round[edit]
- 2004–05 UEFA Cup first round (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pointless content fork from 2004–05 UEFA Cup. Prodded but prod removed without reason by article creator. Number 57 16:01, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:13, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect - back to parent article, no need for a fork. GiantSnowman 08:21, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but the content in the main article needs to be reduced and details from the second leg matches need to be added. Adding all these matches to the main article would make it pretty big, and that is best dealt with by a content fork. – PeeJay 12:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep because it has more detail than parent article--Misconceptions2 (talk) 02:10, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - per PeeJay. --MicroX (talk) 19:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect - having an article about every First Round that has happened since the creation of the UEFA Cup is unneccessary, so merging and redirecting to 2004–05 UEFA Cup would be the best thing to do. If it turns out that the parent article gets too big, it would be reasonable to create a fork. Mentoz86 (talk) 21:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.