Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2002 Winter Olympic Games judging controversy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Olympic Games scandals. All of the useful, non-sensational, non-non-notable information seems already to be there. -Splash^talk 01:25, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2002 Winter Olympic Games judging controversy[edit]

Barely notable documentary from a barely known production company. Also, the article title might be better suited for an article about the actual controversy. Aecis ^Mr.^Mojo ^risin' 22:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Some of the content could be merged to Olympic Games scandals, or if that gets too long, Scandals of the 2002 Winter Olympics. Punkmorten 22:55, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes the merge would be good. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 23:42, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Olympic Games scandals. --Ter e nc e Ong (恭喜发财) 02:31, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this was a huge thing here in Canada. Ardenn 04:03, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I know, it wasn't just a huge thing in Canada. But the article is currently not about the controversy itself, it is an ad for a documentary about that controversy. Aecis ^Mr.^Mojo^risin' 10:43, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Then remove the advertising and make it about the actual event. Ardenn 04:00, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Terence Ruby 04:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge verifiable information per Punkmorten. Delete mentions of (and articles about) nn production company, producer. Keep an eye on vanity-farming user. -- Krash (Talk) 15:00, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and de-POV it. This is not a keep vote. Stifle 00:53, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Olympic Games scandals. --Dogbreathcanada 05:37, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.