Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1st Central

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigmamsg 01:37, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1st Central[edit]

1st Central (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any coverage of this company outside the few refs given (which I'm assuming are legitimate independent trade publications and not just press release-publishing sites? Can anyone confirm this?). I'm not convinced the refs meet the bar of "significant coverage in multiple reliable sources." The article has been tagged as questionable notability for 3.5 years, so perhaps its time for a discussion. Happy to hear the thoughts of others. Ajpolino (talk) 06:26, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ajpolino (talk) 06:28, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:14, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: An article on a car insurance provider, originally created by a WP:SPA and later developed by others with the company name in their account names. The coverage provided and found through searches is a mixture of routine announcements and research releases, as would be expected for a firm which has been reasonably successful in establishing itself in its field, but nothing to suggest encyclopaedic notability. Previous versions of the article included an Ownership section summarising its associated underlying offshore firms[1], but none of these appear notable either. Nor do the listed industry awards bring inherent notability. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 07:36, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per AllyD above, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 21:12, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.